Product
Product overview

See how dev-centric DAST for the enterprise secures your business.

Web attacks

Continuous security testing for web applications at high-scale.

API attacks

Safeguard your APIs no matter how often you deploy.

Business logic attacks

Future-proof your security testing with green-flow exploitation testing.

LLM attacks

Next-gen security testing for LLM & Gen AI powered applications and add-ons.

Interfaces & extensions

Security testing throughout the SDLC - in your team’s native stack.

Integrations

Connecting your security stack & resolution processes seamlessly.

Docs

Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Book a demo

We’ll show you how Bright’s DAST can secure your security posture.

Resources
Blog

Check out or insights & deep dives into the world of security testing.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.

Docs

Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Case studies

Dive into DAST success stories from Bright customers.

Research

Download whitepapers & research on hot topics in the security field.

Company
About us

Who we are, where we came from, and our Bright vision for the future.

News

Bright news hot off the press.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.

We're hiring

Want to join the Bright team? See our open possitions.

Bug bounty

Found a security issue or vulnerability we should hear about? Let us know!

Contact us

Need some help getting started? Looking to collaborate? Talk to us.

Resources > Blog >
5 Types of Application Security Testing You Must Know About

5 Types of Application Security Testing You Must Know About

Nickolay Bakharev

What is Application Security Testing?

Application security testing (AST) is an umbrella term for methodologies that assist in finding and eliminating software vulnerabilities. The security testing process includes tests, analysis, and reports that provide insight into the security level of a software program. 

You can apply the AST process across various phases of the software development lifecycle (SDLC). AST can help catch and remediate software vulnerabilities before deployment to production, reducing the scope of vulnerabilities persisting after deployment. You can also apply AST in production to enable continuous detection of critical threats. 

This is part of an extensive series of guides about security testing.

In this article:

5 Application Security Testing (AST) Solutions

AST won’t happen without tools. Let’s review five types of solutions that can help you test software through the SDLC – from development to production.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

SAST is a form of white-box testing that involves analyzing at-rest source code. SAST tools look for vulnerabilities in the source code that external parties can exploit. 

You can use SAST to the source code of your applications, bytes, and binaries. After analyzing your code, the tool flags exploitable design and coding flaws.

Most SAST scans use a collection of predefined rules to specify coding errors to address. You can also use a SAST scan to detect common security vulnerabilities, such as input validation errors, stack buffer overflow, and SQL injection. 

You can implement SAST during development and quality assurance (QA) and integrate the tool with your integrated development environments (IDEs) and continuous integration (CI) servers. 

Related content: Read our guide to SAST

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

DAST is a form of black-box testing that simulates external attacks on a running application. DAST aims to find architectural weaknesses and security vulnerabilities. 

DAST solutions attempt to penetrate the application from the outside, often by looking for vulnerabilities and flaws in exposed interfaces.

SAST tools perform a line-by-line scan of your application’s source code while it is at rest, while DAST is executed when the application is running. DAST can be used to test an application running in a development or testing environment, or while it is running in production.

Related content: Read our guide to DAST

Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)

IAST tools and testers scan the post-build source code of your application in a dynamic environment. The test is usually executed in a test or QA environment and in real-time while the application is running. You can employ IAST to identify problematic lines of code and get alerts that prompt immediate remediation.

IAST looks directly at the source code post-build in a dynamic environment through the instrumentation of the code. It involves deploying agents and sensors into the application and analyzing the code to detect vulnerabilities. You can easily integrate IAST into your continuous integration / continuous delivery (CI/CD). 

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

SCA tools automatically scan the codebase of your application to provide visibility into open source software usage. SCA tools can identify all open source components in your codebase, the license compliance data of the components, and detect common security vulnerabilities. Some SCA tools can also prioritize open source vulnerabilities and offer insights and automated remediation.

Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP)

Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) is a security technology that provides an additional layer of protection for applications by detecting and preventing attacks in real-time. It is designed to monitor an application during runtime and prevent malicious activity that may not be detected by traditional security measures such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems (IDS), and antivirus software.

RASP works by embedding security controls directly into the application or the runtime environment. The security controls are designed to monitor the application’s behavior, detect any suspicious activity, and take appropriate action to prevent the attack. For example, RASP can prevent SQL injection attacks, buffer overflows, and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

3 Types of Application Security Testing

Application security testing can be categorized into three types: black-box, gray-box, and white-box testing.

Black-Box Security Testing

In black-box security testing, the tester or test automation application does not have information about the internal workings of the system. This allows the tester to simulate a real attack by an external entity. 

Black box testing has the important advantage that it tests application security from end to end, including security misconfigurations and the integration between security systems. For example, if there is a misconfiguration in the firewall, a black box test will immediately discover it because it attempts to access the application like an outside attacker. The disadvantage is that it can miss vulnerabilities in the underlying applications.

Gray-Box Security Testing

In gray-box security testing, the tester or automated test application has limited information about the application. This simulates the case of a privileged insider who uses their knowledge to conduct a more sophisticated attack or a persistent threat conducting in-depth reconnaissance of the environment. 

Gray box testing has the advantage that it balances between testing depth and efficiency. It can be fine-tuned to focus on the most important elements that need to be tested in your security posture. Its disadvantage is that, depending on the information provided to the tester, the test may be skewed or unrealistic.

White-Box Security Testing

In white-box security testing, a human tester or automated testing mechanism receives full access to the internals of the application. A classic example of white box testing is static application security testing (SAST), in which an automated tool scans application source code for bugs and security flaws. 

White-box testing can help uncover many important security issues, such as security misconfiguration in the application itself, poor code quality, insecure coding practices, and business logic vulnerabilities. Its primary advantage is that it is comprehensive and can identify issues that other types of tests miss. However, white-box testing can uncover issues that cannot be easily exploited by an outside attacker, and thus have lower priority.

Related content: Read our guide to mobile app security testing.

Application Security Testing Best Practices

Here are some best practices for effective AST:

  • Start early: AST should be started as early as possible in the application development lifecycle, ideally during the design and planning phase. This allows security considerations to be built into the application from the start, rather than trying to retrofit security later on.
  • Use multiple testing techniques: A combination of static and dynamic testing techniques can provide a more comprehensive view of the application’s security posture. This can help identify a wider range of vulnerabilities than using a single technique alone.
  • Test regularly: AST should be performed regularly, especially during code changes or updates. This ensures that any new code is tested for vulnerabilities before it is deployed.
  • Prioritize vulnerabilities: Not all vulnerabilities are created equal. Prioritize vulnerabilities based on their severity and potential impact, and address the most critical vulnerabilities first.
  • Involve all stakeholders: Application security is everyone’s responsibility. Involve all stakeholders, including developers, testers, and operations teams, in the AST process to ensure that everyone is aware of the risks and taking appropriate actions.
  • Monitor and respond to findings: The AST process is not a one-time event. Continuously monitor the application for new vulnerabilities and respond to findings promptly to ensure that the application remains secure.

Application Security Testing with Bright Security

For a robust AppSec programme, it is important to ensure that security vulnerabilities are detected and remediated early and often. With agile development and CICD, security testing needs to shift left and into the hands of developers.

To succeed, you need to adopt developer-friendly security testing tools like Bright’s DAST scanner, built from the ground up to enable developers to own the security testing process, with the following key features:

  • Developer first – built for DevOps / CICD
  • Test everything – WebApps and APIs (SOAP, REST, GraphQL)
  • Accurate – NO false positives 
  • Automation integrated automatic validation of findings removes manual validation bottlenecks that stifle your release cycles and compound your technical and security debt
  • Feedback Loop – Easy to use, fast scans and integrates across your pipelines 
  • Easy fixes – Developer friendly remediation guidelines, start fixing security issues early and often
  • Detect more – automatic Business Logic vulnerability detection

See Our Additional Guides on Key Security Testing Topics

Together with our content partners, we have authored in-depth guides on several other topics that can also be useful as you explore the world of security testing.

Penetration Testing

DAST

DevSecOps

For more information and resources, see our blog and documentation. Better still, sign up for a FREE account today and start automating your security testing across your pipelines

Resources

DORA: Exploring The Path to Financial Institutions’ Resilience

DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) is the latest addition to the EU regulatory arsenal. A framework designed to bolster the cyber resilience of financial entities operating within the EU. But let’s face it: there’s no lack of regulations issued by the European Union legislature, and they’re not exactly known for keeping things light and easy.

IASTless IAST – The SAST to DAST Bridge

Streamline appsec with IASTless IAST. Simplify deployment, enhance accuracy, and boost your security posture by combining SAST and Bright’s DAST.

Bringing DAST security to AI-generated code

AI-generated code is basically the holy grail of developer tools of this decade. Think back to just over two years ago; every third article discussed how there weren’t enough engineers to answer demand; some companies even offered coding training for candidates wanting to make a career change. The demand for software and hardware innovation was

Get our newsletter