Product overview

See how dev-centric DAST for the enterprise secures your business.

Web attacks

Continuous security testing for web applications at high-scale.

API attacks

Safeguard your APIs no matter how often you deploy.

Business logic attacks

Future-proof your security testing with green-flow exploitation testing.

LLM attacks

Next-gen security testing for LLM & Gen AI powered applications and add-ons.

Interfaces & extensions

Security testing throughout the SDLC - in your team’s native stack.


Connecting your security stack & resolution processes seamlessly.


Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Book a demo

We’ll show you how Bright’s DAST can secure your security posture.


Check out or insights & deep dives into the world of security testing.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.


Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Case studies

Dive into DAST success stories from Bright customers.


Download whitepapers & research on hot topics in the security field.

About us

Who we are, where we came from, and our Bright vision for the future.


Bright news hot off the press.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.

We're hiring

Want to join the Bright team? See our open possitions.

Bug bounty

Found a security issue or vulnerability we should hear about? Let us know!

Contact us

Need some help getting started? Looking to collaborate? Talk to us.

Resources > Blog >
Understanding XML Injection: Risks, Prevention, and Best Practices

Understanding XML Injection: Risks, Prevention, and Best Practices

Amanda McCarvill

In today’s interconnected digital landscape, data exchange plays a pivotal role in web applications. Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a popular format for data interchange due to its flexibility and readability. However, with the rise of cyber threats, developers need to be vigilant about potential vulnerabilities in their applications. One such threat is XML injection, a type of attack that exploits vulnerabilities in XML parsers and processors. In this blog post, we’ll delve into the details of XML injection, its risks, and best practices for prevention. 

What is XML Injection? 

XML injection, also known as XML External Entity (XXE) injection, is a type of security vulnerability that arises when an application processes XML input insecurely. Attackers exploit this vulnerability to include external entities or execute malicious code, potentially leading to sensitive data exposure, denial of service, or even remote code execution. This type of attack is particularly menacing in scenarios where applications parse user-supplied XML data without adequate validation, allowing malicious actors to manipulate the XML structure for their advantage.

One of the key challenges posed by XML injection lies in its ability to target the very core of data exchange in web applications. By manipulating XML input, attackers can trick the application into processing unintended data, leading to unforeseen consequences. As technology evolves, new variations of XML injection exploits emerge, underscoring the importance of developers staying informed about the latest security best practices and vulnerabilities to ensure the resilience of their applications against these sophisticated attacks.

Risks of XML Injection

Sensitive Data Exposure

One of the primary risks associated with XML injection is the potential exposure of sensitive information. Attacks can manipulate XML input to access and retrieve confidential data stored on the server. This may include personally identifiable information (PII), financial records, or proprietary business data. The consequences of such exposure extend beyond immediate financial losses, including reputational damage and legal implications, as organizations may be held accountable for data breaches. 

Denial of Service (DoS)

By injecting malicious XML payloads, attackers can overwhelm the server’s resources, causing a denial of service. This can lead to application downtime, affecting users and disrupting business operations. In addition to the immediate impact on service availability, a successful DoS attack can result in a loss of customer trust, damage to brand reputation, and potential financial repercussions, making it crucial for organizations to implement robust measures against XML injection vulnerabilities. 

Remote Code Execution 

In severe cases, XML injection may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server. This can lead to complete compromise of the application and potentially the underlying server infrastructure. Remote code execution poses a grave threat as attackers gain unauthorized access, enabling them to manipulate data, install malware, or even pivot to other parts of the network. The aftermath of a successful remote code execution attack includes not only the potential loss of sensitive data but also the need for extensive remediation efforts and the implementation of enhanced security measures to prevent future exploits. 

Prevention and Best practices 

To avoid XML injection, consider implementing the following best practices: 

Input Validation and Sanitization

To safeguard against XML injection, it is crucial to implement strict input validation, ensuring that only expected and valid XML content is processed. Additionally, user input must undergo thorough sanitization to remove any malicious characters or entities that could be exploited in an injection attack. By meticulously validating and cleaning input, developers fortify their applications against potential vulnerabilities and bolster overall system security. 

Use of Whitelists

A proactive approach to preventing XML injection involves defining and employing whitelists for allowed XML entities, elements, and attributes. Any input that deviates from the predefined whitelist should be rejected outright. This restrictive approach ensures that only known, safe elements and processed, reducing the risk of malicious XML injection attempts and reinforcing the application’s resilience against unauthorized access. 

Disable External Entity Expansion 

To mitigate the risk of XML injection attacks, it is essential to disable external entity expansion in XML parsers. This precautionary measure prevents the inclusion of external entities, a commonly exploited vector in XML injection attacks. By configuring parsers to disallow external entity expansion, developers minimize the attack surface and fortify their applications against potential security breaches stemming from malicious XML payloads. 

XML Parsers Configuration

An integral aspect of securing XML processing is configuring XML parsers to restrict access to external resources. By ensuring that the application processes XML content securely, developers can thwart attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in the parsing mechanism. Thoughtful configuration of XML parsers strengthens the application’s resilience and forms a critical layer of defense against potential XML injection threats.

Regular Security Audits

Maintaining a robust security posture requires regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and address potential XML injection vulnerabilities in your application. Through systematic evaluation and proactive testing, developers can stay ahead of emerging threats, patch vulnerabilities promptly, and continuously enhance the security of their systems. Regular security audits form an essential component of a comprehensive strategy to safeguard against XML injection and other evolving cyber threats. 


XML Injection poses a significant threat to the security of web applications that process XML input. Developers must adopt a proactive approach by implementing secure coding practices, conducting thorough security assessments, and staying informed about emerging threats. By following best practices and remaining vigilant, organizations can fortify their applications against XML injection attacks and ensure the confidentiality of integrity of their data. 

As technology evolves, it’s crucial for developers to stay up-to-date with the latest advancements in XML security and continuously update their defense mechanisms. Collaborating with cybersecurity experts and participating in information-sharing forums can provide valuable insights into emerging trends and potential vulnerabilities. In this dynamic landscape of web application security, fostering a culture of adaptability and continuous improvement is key to maintaining a robust defense against XML injection and other emerging cybersecurity challenges.


DORA: Exploring The Path to Financial Institutions’ Resilience

DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) is the latest addition to the EU regulatory arsenal. A framework designed to bolster the cyber resilience of financial entities operating within the EU. But let’s face it: there’s no lack of regulations issued by the European Union legislature, and they’re not exactly known for keeping things light and easy.

IASTless IAST – The SAST to DAST Bridge

Streamline appsec with IASTless IAST. Simplify deployment, enhance accuracy, and boost your security posture by combining SAST and Bright’s DAST.

Bringing DAST security to AI-generated code

AI-generated code is basically the holy grail of developer tools of this decade. Think back to just over two years ago; every third article discussed how there weren’t enough engineers to answer demand; some companies even offered coding training for candidates wanting to make a career change. The demand for software and hardware innovation was

Get our newsletter