Product overview

See how dev-centric DAST for the enterprise secures your business.

Web attacks

Continuous security testing for web applications at high-scale.

API attacks

Safeguard your APIs no matter how often you deploy.

Business logic attacks

Future-proof your security testing with green-flow exploitation testing.

LLM attacks

Next-gen security testing for LLM & Gen AI powered applications and add-ons.

Interfaces & extensions

Security testing throughout the SDLC - in your team’s native stack.


Connecting your security stack & resolution processes seamlessly.


Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Book a demo

We’ll show you how Bright’s DAST can secure your security posture.


Check out or insights & deep dives into the world of security testing.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.


Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Case studies

Dive into DAST success stories from Bright customers.


Download whitepapers & research on hot topics in the security field.

About us

Who we are, where we came from, and our Bright vision for the future.


Bright news hot off the press.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.

We're hiring

Want to join the Bright team? See our open possitions.

Bug bounty

Found a security issue or vulnerability we should hear about? Let us know!

Contact us

Need some help getting started? Looking to collaborate? Talk to us.

Resources > Blog >
Unit Testing vs. Integration Testing: 4 Key Differences and How to Choose

Unit Testing vs. Integration Testing: 4 Key Differences and How to Choose

Edward Chopskie

What Is Unit Testing? 

Unit testing is a software testing technique where the individual components or units of a product are tested. Its purpose is to confirm whether each unit of the code performs as expected. Essentially, the “unit” in Unit Testing refers to the smallest testable part of an application. This could be a function, a procedure, an interface, or a method, depending on the specific programming language you’re working with.

In unit testing, each section of code is isolated and tested separately to ascertain its correctness. This isolation is vital for accurate results, as it ensures that the test is focused solely on the unit in question, without any interference from other parts of the code. Unit testing is usually conducted by the developers themselves, immediately after a specific function or method has been developed.

Unit testing is a fundamental part of the software development process. It helps in identifying and fixing bugs at an early stage, making the code more reliable and robust. When changes are made to the software, previously written unit tests can provide assurance that the existing functionality still works as intended.

What Is Integration Testing? 

Integration testing is a software testing approach in which individual software modules are combined and tested as a group. The primary purpose of integration testing is to expose flaws in the interactions between integrated units.

In contrast to unit testing, where individual units are isolated and tested separately, integration testing focuses on the interfaces and interaction between units. It aims to detect issues that may arise when different components interact with each other, such as data inconsistencies, communication problems, or function mismatches.

Integration testing is generally performed after unit testing and before system testing in the software testing process. It is typically carried out by a testing team, rather than the developers themselves. While this type of testing can be more complex and time-consuming than unit testing, it is crucial for ensuring that all parts of the system work together correctly.

The following diagram illustrates the position of unit tests and integration tests in the overall ‘testing pyramid’. Unit tests are at the base of the pyramid, indicating that typically, there will be more unit tests than any other testing type.

In this article:

Unit Testing vs. Integration Testing: Key Differences 

Understanding the differences between unit testing and integration testing is vital for applying the right testing strategy at the right time. These differences can be categorized in the following ways:

1. Component-Level vs Interaction-Level

The fundamental difference between unit testing and integration testing lies in the level at which testing is performed. Unit testing is a component-level testing method. It focuses on testing individual components or units of a software in isolation. On the other hand, integration testing is an interaction-level testing method. It focuses on testing the interaction between different components of a software.

2. Complexity

Unit testing is simpler and more straightforward than integration testing. Since unit testing involves testing individual components in isolation, it’s easier to pinpoint the cause of a failure. Conversely, integration testing, which tests the interaction between different components, is more complex because a failure can be due to a multitude of factors.

3. Speed and Efficiency

Unit testing is usually faster and more efficient than integration testing. This is because it’s easier and quicker to test a single component in isolation rather than multiple components together. However, while unit testing can help catch issues early, it cannot identify problems that may arise when different components interact. This is where integration testing comes in, providing a more comprehensive check of the system’s functionality.

4. Tools and Technologies

For unit testing, tools like JUnit, NUnit, and PHPUnit are typically used. These tools provide a framework for writing and running test cases and are usually integrated with the development environment. For integration testing, tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and TeamCity are often used. These tools help in automating the process of combining and testing different components together.

Learn more in our detailed guide to unit testing best practices 

Unit Testing and Integration Testing: When to Use 

Unit Testing

Early Development Stages

During the early stages of development, when individual software components are being written, unit testing proves to be invaluable. It helps developers to identify and rectify any issues in their code at an early stage, thus saving time and effort in the long run. By testing each unit in isolation, developers can ensure that their code behaves as expected under different scenarios.

Continuous Development

In the realm of Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD), where new code is constantly being integrated and deployed, unit testing plays a critical role. It provides a safety net that allows developers to add new features or make changes to the existing codebase confidently. If the new code causes any existing unit tests to fail, developers can quickly identify and rectify the issue before it affects the rest of the application.


When it comes to refactoring, or altering the code to improve its structure without changing its behavior, unit testing is a developer’s best friend. A comprehensive set of unit tests can serve as a reliable indicator that the refactoring process has not inadvertently altered the functionality of the code. This facilitates a smooth and efficient refactoring process, ensuring the integrity of the codebase.

Isolated Functionality Testing

Unit testing is also useful when it comes to testing isolated functionality. Unit tests allow developers to verify the functionality of each component in isolation, without having to test the rest of the application. This helps ensure that each component behaves as expected, regardless of the state or behavior of other components.

Learn more in our detailed guide to unit testing vs functional testing 

Integration Testing

After Unit Testing

Once all the individual components of the software have undergone unit tests, it’s time to move on to integration testing. This type of testing ensures that the different components of the software work together as expected. It helps to identify any issues that may arise due to the interaction of different components, which might not have been evident during unit testing.

Complex Systems with Multiple Interactions

In complex systems where multiple components interact with each other, integration testing allows developers to verify that the interactions between different components are functioning as expected. This is particularly important in today’s world of microservices and distributed systems, where a single application may consist of numerous interconnected components.

Validating Data Flow

Integration testing also plays a key role in validating data flow between different components of a software. It verifies that data is correctly passed between different components and that no data is lost or incorrectly altered in the process. This is particularly important in applications where accurate data handling is critical, such as financial or healthcare applications.

End-to-End Testing Scenarios

Integration testing ensures that the entire application, from the front-end user interface to the back-end database, works as expected under different scenarios. It helps to identify any issues that may arise when the application is used in a real-world scenario.

Learn more about Bright Security


DORA: Exploring The Path to Financial Institutions’ Resilience

DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) is the latest addition to the EU regulatory arsenal. A framework designed to bolster the cyber resilience of financial entities operating within the EU. But let’s face it: there’s no lack of regulations issued by the European Union legislature, and they’re not exactly known for keeping things light and easy.

IASTless IAST – The SAST to DAST Bridge

Streamline appsec with IASTless IAST. Simplify deployment, enhance accuracy, and boost your security posture by combining SAST and Bright’s DAST.

Bringing DAST security to AI-generated code

AI-generated code is basically the holy grail of developer tools of this decade. Think back to just over two years ago; every third article discussed how there weren’t enough engineers to answer demand; some companies even offered coding training for candidates wanting to make a career change. The demand for software and hardware innovation was

Get our newsletter