Product overview

See how dev-centric DAST for the enterprise secures your business.

Web attacks

Continuous security testing for web applications at high-scale.

API attacks

Safeguard your APIs no matter how often you deploy.

Business logic attacks

Future-proof your security testing with green-flow exploitation testing.

LLM attacks

Next-gen security testing for LLM & Gen AI powered applications and add-ons.

Interfaces & extensions

Security testing throughout the SDLC - in your team’s native stack.


Connecting your security stack & resolution processes seamlessly.


Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Book a demo

We’ll show you how Bright’s DAST can secure your security posture.


Check out or insights & deep dives into the world of security testing.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.


Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Case studies

Dive into DAST success stories from Bright customers.


Download whitepapers & research on hot topics in the security field.

About us

Who we are, where we came from, and our Bright vision for the future.


Bright news hot off the press.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.

We're hiring

Want to join the Bright team? See our open possitions.

Bug bounty

Found a security issue or vulnerability we should hear about? Let us know!

Contact us

Need some help getting started? Looking to collaborate? Talk to us.

Resources > Blog >
Why are SAST solutions not always the best option for AST?best ways to test Microservices security

Why are SAST solutions not always the best option for AST?best ways to test Microservices security

Nickolay Bakharev

There are many methodologies you can use to detect application vulnerabilities. One of the most common methodologies is Static Application (or Analysis) Security Testing. Before we dive into the shortcomings of SAST solutions, let’s first outline what Static Application Security Testing is.

What is Static Application Security Testing?

SAST is a set of technologies that analyze the application’s code, byte code, and binaries line by line. As the analyzed code is transparent and available to the tool, Static Application Security Testing is a white-box testing technique.

Learn more in our detailed guide to iast.

Static Application Security Testing offers:

  • Accuracy when it comes to recognizing flaws in the code
  • Identification of vulnerabilities specific to code
  • Identification of weaknesses that can become severe security risks if they aren’t remediated

The ability of SAST solutions to find the exact line of code that needs remediation can reduce remediation time and effort for developers.

To learn more about SAST solutions you can check out these resources:

Shortcomings of SAST solutions

Limitation 1: Inability to scan runtime applications

While SAST solutions can detect many common vulnerabilities like XSS, buffer overflow, and SQL Injection, they are limited to vulnerabilities that occur in the code itself. Unfortunately, many vulnerabilities in a runtime application do not actually exist in the code, but only arise when the application is compiled. If you rely solely on SAST solutions, you may release potentially vulnerable applications.

As an exampleStatic Application Security Testing falls short when it comes to finding issues connected to:

  • Authentication (is the code vulnerable to brute force attacks, or is a password reset as effective as it can be, etc.)
  • Sensitive data storage and transmission (especially in cases when it can’t tell the difference between sensitive and non-sensitive data)
  • Privilege escalation and lack of authorization
  • Data privacy (making sure it masks certain sensitive information when it’s displayed)

These issues become even more acute when dealing with a microservices environment where much of the code actually sits between the different services.

Learn more in our detailed guide to shift left testing.

Limitation 2: SAST needs access to source code

Some organizations don’t have access to the application’s source code. This is a big issue as Static Application Security Testing is complex. For it to function properly it needs a semantic understanding of the code. This includes the codes’ dependencies, configuration files, etc. and many of other pieces that are always in motion. Most dependencies aren’t even written in the same programming language. Can SAST understand all these moving pieces? While also being swift, accurate, and have a low false-positives rate? Not exactly.

Limitation 3: The need for a different SAST instance for every coding language

When an organization uses multiple code languages, multiple instances of SAST solutions are needed.

That means all of them require separate maintenance and configuration. This adds significant overhead. 

Limitation 4: Limited coding language support

In addition to requiring a different SAST instance for each coding language used in an organization, SAST is limited to specific coding languages. While SAST providers are constantly adding support for new languages, there are some languages that will never be supported and others where SAST falls short from providing complete coverage.

As examples, the effectiveness of SAST is reduced when JavaScript, Python, and other dynamically typed languages are used.

JavaScript is the standard programming language of the web, and web is the most used computing platform ever built. SAST’s inability to work well with JavaScript represents a significant limitation. There are over 1.6 billion websites in the world. JavaScript is used in 95% of them.

Learn more in our detailed guide to iast.

Limitation 5: Disadvantages in a Microservices environment

Another issue with Static Application Security Testing tools is the Microservices architecture. SAST solutions can’t work in a world of Microservices. That’s a huge problem as most developers today use microservices architecture. Microservices architecture is highly maintainable and organized around business capabilities.

Check out best ways to test Microservices security.

Limitation 6: False Positives

One of the biggest problems with SAST solutions is that they are prone to false positives. Developers can get results that point out a lot of findings. Only it turns out most weren’t actually exploitable, or relevant. These results take time to examine and see if a flaw can damage your application or not.

Stay tuned for our next post that outlines the comparison between SAST & DAST.


DORA: Exploring The Path to Financial Institutions’ Resilience

DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) is the latest addition to the EU regulatory arsenal. A framework designed to bolster the cyber resilience of financial entities operating within the EU. But let’s face it: there’s no lack of regulations issued by the European Union legislature, and they’re not exactly known for keeping things light and easy.

IASTless IAST – The SAST to DAST Bridge

Streamline appsec with IASTless IAST. Simplify deployment, enhance accuracy, and boost your security posture by combining SAST and Bright’s DAST.

Bringing DAST security to AI-generated code

AI-generated code is basically the holy grail of developer tools of this decade. Think back to just over two years ago; every third article discussed how there weren’t enough engineers to answer demand; some companies even offered coding training for candidates wanting to make a career change. The demand for software and hardware innovation was

Get our newsletter