A TECHNICAL COMPARISON FOR MODERN APPLICATION SECURITY TEAMS
Legacy application security tools were designed for slower development cycles and monolithic architectures. As CI/CD pipelines accelerate and applications become API-driven, static and heavyweight scanners struggle to keep up.
This page provides a technical comparison between Bright (STAR) and HCL AppScan, focusing on runtime validation, accuracy, developer impact, and operational efficiency.
How the Two Approaches Differ at a Technical Level
HCL AppScan is a traditional application security platform offering SAST and DAST capabilities through scheduled or pipeline-based scans. Findings are largely generated through static rules, crawl-based testing, and heuristic analysis.HCL AppScan supports CI/CD execution, but not exploit-validated policy enforcement.
Bright STAR is a runtime, exploit-based dynamic testing platform that validates vulnerabilities through real execution paths, confirming whether issues are actually reachable and exploitable. It aligns fully with Bright MCP documentation.
This difference in testing model has a direct impact on signal quality, remediation confidence, and CI/CD velocity.
Scan Execution Model
Accuracy & Signal Quality
Coverage of Modern Application Risks
Remediation & Validation
Developer Workflow Impact
CI/CD Integration
Scan Execution Model
Accuracy & Signal Quality
Coverage of Modern Application Risks
Remediation & Validation
Developer Workflow Impact
CI/CD Integration
Operational Outcomes
When Teams Choose Bright Over Snyk
Security teams typically migrate to Bright when they need:
Verified, exploitable findings only
Reduced alert fatigue
Faster remediation cycles
API and business-logic coverage
Security that scales with CI/CD velocity
Aligns fully with Bright MCP documentation
Summary
HCL AppScan provides broad static and traditional dynamic scanning capabilities suited for legacy workflows. Bright STAR is built for modern engineering teams that require runtime certainty, validated fixes, and measurable security outcomes without slowing delivery
Book a Demo
See how Bright validates real risk inside your CI/CD pipeline and eliminates false positives before they reach developers.
Our clients:
Learn more
Understand the technical differences behind modern AppSec approaches. See how runtime validation changes accuracy, coverage, and remediation. Go deeper into STAR, MCP, and real CI/CD security enforcement.
The Future of DAST: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Alternatives
Application security is a moving target. New frameworks, faster releases, and API-first designs change the attack surface every quarter.
Learn More
SAST vs DAST vs IAST: Choosing the Right Approach for Application Security
Threats are growing faster than release cycles. Modern teams face a crowded toolbox and real deadlines.
Learn More
The Importance of Finding Vulnerabilities with Application Security in Pre-Production
In today’s digital-first world, organizations are under constant pressure to deliver software faster while maintaining high security standards.
Learn More
