Table of Content
- What is Fuzzing?
- Why are the World’s Biggest Companies Implementing Fuzz Testing?
- Types of Fuzzing Tools
- How Does Application Fuzzing Work?
- Bright: Fuzz Testing for Application Security
- Types of Fuzzing: Mutation, Generation, and Grammar-Based
- Common Application Fuzzing. Limitations
- Fuzzing Tools and Frameworks You Should Know
- Interpreting Application Fuzzing Results and Reducing False Positives
- See Additional Guides on Key Machine Learning Topics
What is Fuzzing?
Fuzzing is the art of automatic bug detection. The goal of fuzzing is to stress the application and cause unexpected behavior, resource leaks, or crashes.
The process involves throwing invalid, unexpected, or random data as inputs at a computer. Fuzzers repeat this process and monitor the environment until they detect a vulnerability.
Threat actors use fuzzing to find zero-day exploits – this is known as a fuzzing attack. Security professionals, on the other hand, leverage fuzzing techniques to assess the security and stability of applications.
This is part of an extensive series of guides about machine learning.
Why are the World’s Biggest Companies Implementing Fuzz Testing?
Some of the world’s biggest and most respected organizations are implementing fuzzing as part of their quality control and cybersecurity operations:
- Google uses fuzzing to check and protect millions of lines of code in Chrome. In 2019, Google discovered more than 20,000 vulnerabilities in Chrome via internal fuzz testing.
- Microsoft uses fuzzing as one of the stages in its software development lifecycle, to find vulnerabilities and improve the stability of its products.
- The US Department of Defence (DoD) issued a DevSecOps Reference Design and a
Application Security Guide which both requires fuzz testing as a standard part of software development processes.
These and many other organizations are adopting fuzzing into their standard development processes for several reasons:
- Fuzzing does not just identify the problem, it also shows the cause of the problem and how an attacker may interact with it in a real-life attack.
- Fuzzing proves a vulnerability exists, identifying problems without having to sift through false positives.
- Fuzzing is fully automated, and can run independently for days or even weeks, identifying more and more vulnerabilities in a system under test.
- Fuzzing is highly useful for developers. The role of developers is to develop and improve product features. While traditional security tools only point out flaws, fuzzers show the result of the flaw and demonstrate the impact of solving it.
Types of Fuzzing Tools
Fuzzing tools can be grouped into four basic types.
Grammar-Based F vs. Mutuation Fuzzing
Grammer-based or mutation fuzzers are defined by the way they handle test case generation. Some fuzzers combine both approaches.
Grammar-based fuzzers generate new test cases from a supplied model. The tester defines a “grammar”, specifying the format of inputs accepted by the application, and can define which parts of the input should be fuzzed. The fuzzer uses this model to generate a large number of inputs, which are similar to legitimate inputs, but violate some of the application’s constraints.
Mutation fuzzers randomly mutate a supplied seed input object. They are not constrained by a specific model, and “go crazy” by generating large numbers of unusual inputs. This can be very successful at identifying new bugs or execution paths that may have not been specified by the user in a grammar-based fuzzer.
Black-Box vs. White-Box Fuzzing
Fuzzers can also be grouped into either black-box or white-box approaches.
Black-box fuzzers don’t have access to program artifacts and are more commonly used by cybersecurity researchers looking for vulnerabilities in commercial products. Black-box fuzzing randomly mutates program inputs and sees how the program reacts to it. It can be highly effective in finding new bugs and security issues.
White-box fuzzers by definition require access to program source code. They are commonly used by red teams working for organizations responsible for systems or by software testing groups.
White-box fuzzing involves sweeping the program and identifying conditional branches and constraints on inputs. The fuzzer then systematically violates each of the constraints and evaluates the response.
This is a very comprehensive process that, in theory, can access all possible execution paths of the program. It can usually discover more bugs than a black-box approach, but is lacking in that it does not test the software from an external, attacker perspective.
How Does Application Fuzzing Work?
As we established above, fuzzing software is a great tool capable of finding zero-day vulnerabilities, but how does a fuzzer work?
1. Generating Test Cases
First, test cases are generated. Each security test case can be generated as a random, or semi-random data set, and then sent as input to the application.
The data set can be either generated in conformance to the format requirements of the system’s input, or as a completely malformed chunk of data the system was not meant to understand or process.
What do you think would happen to an application if negative numbers, null characters, or even special characters, were sent to some input fields? Do you know how your application would behave?
2. Interfacing with the Target to Deliver the Input
While fuzz testing, a fuzzer can interface with an application, a protocol, or a file format. While doing that, a fuzzer sends test cases to the target over the network or via a command-line argument of a running application.
Imaginative use cases can reveal ways to expose a relevant piece of code with the right specific data.
3. Monitoring the System to Detect Crashes
The success of a fuzz test is measured by the ability to confirm the impact that a fuzzer has on the targeted application.
Bright: Fuzz Testing for Application Security
Bright is the world’s first AI-Powered Application Security Fuzz-testing tool.
Bright offers the combination of the world’s leading DAST solution and a self-evolving, adaptive-learning fuzzer solution. Bright applies evolution strategies and reinforcement learning to extensively analyze the response of the application and the context of a given attack surface breaking the assumed scope of the target. Bright reports vulnerabilities that are invisible to other, unintelligent fuzz testing tools.
Bright combines different technologies to raise efficiency and performance as the most comprehensive, reliable, and accurate solution. Brightcomes with zero false-positives.
Learn more about Bright Dynamic Application Security Testing
Types of Fuzzing: Mutation, Generation, and Grammar-Based
When people ask what application fuzzing is, they usually want to know how it works in life. The answer usually starts with the types of application fuzzing.
Application fuzzing has types. Mutation-based application fuzzing is a common type of application fuzzing. It takes input and changes it a little. Like changing characters or adding weird values. To see how the application reacts to this new input. Generation-based application fuzzing is different. It makes inputs from scratch using predefined rules. This type of application fuzzing is more controlled. It also needs more setup.
Then there is grammar-based application fuzzing. This type of application fuzzing is useful for formats like XML or JSON. It knows the structure. Makes inputs that are technically good but still unusual. Each type of application fuzzing has its use depending on how the application handles input and where you think the weaknesses are in the application.
Common Application Fuzzing. Limitations
Understanding what application fuzzing is also means knowing where it does not work well. Application fuzzing is powerful. It is not a magic solution that fixes everything.
One common problem is that it does not cover everything. Application fuzzing tools might find inputs but miss deeper logic paths, especially in applications with authentication or multi-step workflows. Another challenge is that it can make a lot of noise. Application fuzzing can cause a lot of crashes or weird behavior that does not always mean there is a weakness.
There is also the problem of context. Application fuzzing tools do not always understand the business logic, so they may miss issues that only appear under certain conditions. Sometimes, setting it up becomes a barrier. Setting up effective application fuzzing takes time. So while application fuzzing is useful, it works best when used with testing approaches.
Fuzzing Tools and Frameworks You Should Know
If you are learning about application fuzzing, you will eventually learn about the tools that make it possible. There are tools, and each tool has a slightly different purpose.
For level or binary application fuzzing tools like American Fuzzy Lop are widely used. They focus on finding crashes by changing inputs. For web applications, tools like Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP have application fuzzing features that let you test parameters and endpoints.
There are also frameworks designed for APIs and structured data, where application fuzzing needs to respect formats. Some teams even build custom application fuzzing tools tailored to their applications. The choice really depends on what you are testing. Web apps, APIs, or system-level code. No single tool is good for every use case.
Interpreting Application Fuzzing Results and Reducing False Positives
Running an application fuzzer is one thing. Making sense of the results is another thing. When people ask what application fuzzing is, they often forget how much work goes into analyzing the output.
Application fuzzing can generate hundreds or even thousands of results. Not all of them are important. Some crashes are harmless while others point to weaknesses. The challenge is figuring out which one is which.
This is where validation becomes important. Of just flagging issues, teams need to confirm whether a finding is actually exploitable. Reproducing the issue, checking logs, and understanding application behavior all play a role.
Reducing positives is not about ignoring results. It is about filtering them intelligently so teams can focus on what really matters about application fuzzing.
See Additional Guides on Key Machine Learning Topics
Together with our content partners, we have authored in-depth guides on several other topics that can also be useful as you explore the world of machine learning.
Advanced Threat Protection
Authored by Cynet
- 7 Cyber Security Frameworks You Must Know About
- What is Network Analytics? From Detection to Active Prevention
- Advanced Threat Protection: A Real-Time Threat Killer Machine
Multi GPU
Authored by Run.AI
- Multi GPU: An In-Depth Look
- Keras Multi GPU: A Practical Guide
- How to Build Your GPU Cluster: Process and Hardware Options
Auto Image Crop
Authored by Cloudinary
