Product
Product overview

See how dev-centric DAST for the enterprise secures your business.

Web attacks

Continuous security testing for web applications at high-scale.

API attacks

Safeguard your APIs no matter how often you deploy.

Business logic attacks

Future-proof your security testing with green-flow exploitation testing.

LLM attacks

Next-gen security testing for LLM & Gen AI powered applications and add-ons.

Interfaces & extensions

Security testing throughout the SDLC - in your team’s native stack.

Integrations

Connecting your security stack & resolution processes seamlessly.

Docs

Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Book a demo

We’ll show you how Bright’s DAST can secure your security posture.

Resources
Blog

Check out or insights & deep dives into the world of security testing.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.

Docs

Getting started with Bright and implementing it in your enterprise stack.

Case studies

Dive into DAST success stories from Bright customers.

Research

Download whitepapers & research on hot topics in the security field.

Company
About us

Who we are, where we came from, and our Bright vision for the future.

News

Bright news hot off the press.

Webinars & events

Upcoming & on-demand events and webinars from security experts.

We're hiring

Want to join the Bright team? See our open possitions.

Bug bounty

Found a security issue or vulnerability we should hear about? Let us know!

Contact us

Need some help getting started? Looking to collaborate? Talk to us.

Resources > Blog >
Web Application Security Testing: Techniques, Tools, and Methodology

Web Application Security Testing: Techniques, Tools, and Methodology

Edward Chopskie

What Is Web Application Security Testing? 

Web application security testing involves evaluating an application’s design, functionality, and codebase to ensure its resilience against malicious attacks. This testing helps organizations protect sensitive data, maintain user trust, and comply with industry regulations. It can help test for and prevent attack vectors like cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, and weak or broken access control.

By conducting regular vulnerability assessments and penetration testing, organizations can identify and address potential security weaknesses before they can be exploited by attackers. Implementing security measures such as access control and encryption can significantly reduce the attack surface of web applications.

In this article:

Why Is Web Application Security Testing Important?

Web application security testing is crucial for several reasons: 

  • It helps you identify flaws and vulnerabilities in your application that could be exploited by attackers, thereby preventing potential data breaches and financial losses. Performing periodic security assessments is essential for protecting user data and averting any potential intrusions.
  • In addition to safeguarding user data, web application security testing enables businesses to comply with laws, regulations, and industry standards such as GDPR or PCI DSS.
  • Analyzing your current security posture through web application testing allows you to detect any existing security breaches or anomalous behavior before they escalate into major incidents. Proactively taking steps to assess your security posture through web application testing can help avoid costly incident response and data breaches.

Web Application Security Testing Techniques and Tools

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a white-box testing technique that involves analyzing an application’s source code, bytecode, or binary code to identify potential security vulnerabilities. By examining the application’s code without executing it, SAST enables developers and security professionals to detect issues early in the development process, facilitating early remediation and reducing the risk of a security breach.

The primary advantage of SAST is its ability to detect security vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. This early detection allows developers to address issues before they become deeply ingrained in the application, reducing the cost and effort required for remediation. Additionally, SAST tools can be easily integrated into the development process, enabling continuous security testing and ensuring that security is considered from the outset of a project. Finally, SAST provides a comprehensive analysis of an application’s code, helping to identify issues that may not be detectable through other testing techniques.

Learn more in our detailed guide to mobile security.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is a black-box testing technique that involves executing an application and analyzing its behavior to identify potential security vulnerabilities. Unlike SAST, which focuses on the application’s code, DAST examines the application as it runs, allowing testers to detect issues that may not be apparent through static analysis alone.

DAST offers several advantages over other testing techniques. Firstly, because it examines an application during runtime, DAST can identify issues that may only become apparent when the application is in use, such as runtime injection attacks or configuration errors. Additionally, DAST is often more accessible to non-developers, as it does not require a deep understanding of the application’s source code. Finally, DAST tools can often be used to test both web applications and APIs, providing a comprehensive security testing solution.

Related content: Read our guide to SAST vs. DAST

Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)

Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) is a hybrid approach that combines aspects of both SAST and DAST. IAST involves instrumenting an application during runtime and monitoring its behavior to identify security vulnerabilities. By analyzing both the application’s code and its runtime behavior, IAST provides a more comprehensive view of an application’s security posture than either SAST or DAST alone.

IAST offers several advantages over traditional testing techniques. Firstly, by combining static and dynamic analysis, IAST provides a more complete picture of an application’s security, enabling testers to detect issues that may be missed by SAST or DAST alone. Additionally, because IAST tools monitor an application during runtime, they can often provide more accurate and actionable information about vulnerabilities, helping to reduce false positives and facilitate remediation efforts.

Related content: Read our guide to IAST vs. DAST

Penetration Testing

Penetration Testing, often referred to as pentesting, is a security testing technique that involves simulating real-world attacks on an application or network to identify potential vulnerabilities and assess the effectiveness of an organization’s security controls. Penetration tests are typically performed by experienced security professionals known as ethical hackers or pentesters, who use a combination of automated tools and manual techniques to identify and exploit vulnerabilities.

Penetration testing offers several benefits over other security testing techniques. Firstly, by simulating real-world attacks, penetration tests provide organizations with a realistic view of their security posture, enabling them to better understand and prioritize their security risks. 

Additionally, penetration tests can help organizations to identify weaknesses in their security controls and processes, facilitating improvements in their overall security strategy. Finally, penetration tests can help organizations to meet regulatory requirements and demonstrate compliance with industry standards, such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).

A Methodology for Web Application Security Testing 

A thorough web application security testing process consists of four main stages:

Stage I: Initiation

Understanding the application

The first step in the web application security testing process is to gain a thorough understanding of the application you are testing. This includes identifying the application’s purpose, target audience, and primary functionality. Additionally, it is crucial to understand the underlying technologies and frameworks used in the application’s development, as these can often present unique security challenges.

Defining the scope of testing

Once you have a solid understanding of the application, the next step is to define the scope of your security testing. This involves identifying the specific areas of the application that will be tested and the types of vulnerabilities that you will be looking for. Establishing a clear testing scope ensures that your efforts are focused and efficient, and it also helps to prevent potential gaps in your testing coverage.

Assembling the testing Team

The final step in the initiation stage is to assemble a team of security professionals who will be responsible for conducting the testing. This team should include individuals with a diverse range of expertise, including developers, security analysts, and system administrators. Team members should have a strong understanding of web application security principles, as well as experience with the specific technologies and frameworks used in the application being tested.

Stage II: Evaluation

Reviewing documentation

The evaluation stage begins with a thorough review of the available documentation for the application. This includes examining any user guides, design documents, and API documentation that may be available. Reviewing the documentation can provide valuable insights into the application’s architecture, data flows, and potential security risks.

Identifying potential threats

After reviewing the documentation, the testing team should work together to identify potential threats to the application. This involves considering the various ways in which an attacker could exploit vulnerabilities in the application and the potential impacts of those exploits. By identifying potential threats, the team can prioritize their testing efforts and focus on the most critical vulnerabilities.

Developing a test plan

The final step in the evaluation stage is to develop a comprehensive test plan that outlines the specific tests that will be conducted, the tools and techniques that will be used, and the expected outcomes of each test. The test plan should be developed in collaboration with the entire testing team and should be based on the identified threats and the application’s unique characteristics.

Stage III: Discovery

Conducting the tests

With a solid test plan in place, the testing team can begin conducting the various tests outlined in the plan. This may involve using automated tools to scan the application for known vulnerabilities, as well as manual testing techniques to explore potential weaknesses in the application’s logic and functionality. Throughout the testing process, it is essential that the team carefully document their findings and any relevant supporting evidence.

Analyzing the results

Once all the tests have been conducted, the team should analyze the results to identify any vulnerabilities that were discovered. This may involve reviewing the output from automated scanning tools, examining logs and other system data, and discussing the results with other team members.

Validating the findings

Before moving on to the reporting stage, it is crucial that the testing team validates their findings by attempting to exploit the identified vulnerabilities. This helps to confirm that the issues are genuine and not false positives, and it can also provide valuable information about the potential impacts of the vulnerabilities. Validating the findings is an essential step in the discovery process, as it ensures that the final report is accurate and reliable.

Stage IV: Reporting

Compiling results

The first step in the reporting stage is to compile the results of the testing process into a clear and concise format. This may involve creating a spreadsheet or database that includes information about each identified vulnerability, such as its severity, location, and potential impact. Additionally, the team should include any supporting evidence that was collected during the testing process, such as screenshots, logs, or code samples.

Developing recommendations

Based on the identified vulnerabilities, the testing team should develop a set of recommendations for addressing the issues and improving the application’s overall security posture. These recommendations may include specific steps for remediation, such as patching or updating software, as well as broader suggestions for improving the application’s architecture or design. The recommendations should be realistic and achievable, and they should take into account the unique characteristics of the application and its environment.

Presenting the report

The final step in the web application security testing process is to present the report to the appropriate stakeholders, such as the application’s developers, management, or clients. This presentation should include a clear explanation of the testing methodology, the findings, and the recommendations for improvement.

Related content: Read our guide to security testing tools.

Learn more about Bright Security

Resources

DORA: Exploring The Path to Financial Institutions’ Resilience

DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) is the latest addition to the EU regulatory arsenal. A framework designed to bolster the cyber resilience of financial entities operating within the EU. But let’s face it: there’s no lack of regulations issued by the European Union legislature, and they’re not exactly known for keeping things light and easy.

IASTless IAST – The SAST to DAST Bridge

Streamline appsec with IASTless IAST. Simplify deployment, enhance accuracy, and boost your security posture by combining SAST and Bright’s DAST.

Bringing DAST security to AI-generated code

AI-generated code is basically the holy grail of developer tools of this decade. Think back to just over two years ago; every third article discussed how there weren’t enough engineers to answer demand; some companies even offered coding training for candidates wanting to make a career change. The demand for software and hardware innovation was

Get our newsletter